By Sapumal Herath · Owner & Blogger, AI Buzz · Last updated: February 22, 2026 · Difficulty: Beginner
“Is this chatbot actually good?”
It’s the most common question in AI projects, and usually, the answer is: “It feels okay.”
But “feeling okay” isn’t enough when you’re shipping to customers. You need to know if the answers are accurate, if the safety filters work, and if your RAG system is finding the right documents.
This beginner-friendly guide explains AI Evaluation (Evals) in plain English. You’ll learn what metrics matter, how to stop “vibe checking,” and how to use a simple scorecard to measure success.
🎯 What is “AI Evaluation”? (Plain English)
AI Evaluation is the process of testing your AI system against a set of questions to see how well it performs.
Think of it like grading a student’s homework. You compare the AI’s answer to:
- A known “correct” answer (Ground Truth).
- A set of quality rules (Tone, Format, Safety).
- The source documents it used (Citation accuracy).
🚫 The “Vibe Check” Trap
Most teams start by typing 5–10 random questions into the chat. If the answers look good, they ship it.
Why this fails:
- You forget to test edge cases (weird inputs).
- You don’t notice when a prompt change fixes one thing but breaks another (Regression).
- It’s subjective. “Good” to you might be “Wrong” to a subject matter expert.
📊 The 3 Metrics That Actually Matter
Don’t get lost in complex math. Start with these three buckets:
1) Answer Quality (Accuracy)
Did it answer the user’s question correctly? Did it follow instructions?
- Metric: Correctness (1–5 scale).
- Test: Compare against a “Golden Answer” written by a human expert.
2) Retrieval Quality (For RAG)
Did the system find the right document to answer the question?
- Metric: Context Relevance (Did it pull the right page?).
- Test: Check if the retrieved chunks actually contain the answer.
3) Safety & Refusal
Did it refuse to answer bad questions? Did it stay polite?
- Metric: Refusal Rate (Should be 100% for harmful prompts).
- Test: Run a small set of “jailbreak” or off-topic prompts.
🤖 “LLM-as-a-Judge” (Automating the Grading)
Grading thousands of chats by hand is impossible. The industry solution is LLM-as-a-Judge.
You use a smart, capable model (like GPT-4 or Claude 3.5 Sonnet) to grade the answers of your faster, cheaper production model.
How it works:
- Input: User Question + AI Answer + Source Doc.
- Judge Prompt: “You are a strict grader. Rate the answer from 1 to 5 based on whether it is supported by the Source Doc.”
- Output: A score and a reason.
✅ Copy/Paste: The Simple Human Grading Rubric
Use this scorecard for manual reviews or to instruct your LLM Judge.
| Score | Definition | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 5 (Excellent) | Perfect | Correct, complete, polite, and fully grounded in sources. |
| 4 (Good) | Acceptable | Correct but maybe wordy or missed a minor detail. Safe to ship. |
| 3 (Okay) | Minor Issues | Partially correct, but vague or slightly off-tone. Needs edit. |
| 2 (Poor) | Bad | Incorrect facts, missed the user’s intent, or hallucinates. |
| 1 (Failure) | Harmful | Safety failure, toxic content, or confident lies. Critical fix needed. |
🧭 Your “Start Small” Roadmap
Phase 1: Build a “Golden Dataset”
Collect 20–50 questions that represent real user needs. Write the ideal answer for each.
Phase 2: Manual Grading
Run your AI against those 50 questions. Grade them yourself using the rubric. Fix the prompt until you hit >90% “Good/Excellent.”
Phase 3: Automated Regression Testing
Use an eval tool or script (LLM-as-a-Judge) to run these 50 questions automatically every time you change the prompt or code. If the score drops, don’t ship.
🔗 Keep exploring on AI Buzz
🏁 Conclusion
You can’t improve what you don’t measure.
Move from “vibes” to metrics. Start with a simple 50-question test set and a 1–5 scoring rubric. It’s the difference between a toy project and a professional AI system.
Leave a Reply